Friday, July 23, 2010

Andrews Defeats McPhillips, Joins Kay, Price and Harrison in Girls 18s Clay Court Semifinals


©Colette Lewis 2010--
Memphis, TN--

She may not have much experience with clay or with the heat and humidity plaguing Memphis this week, but 13-year-old Gabrielle Andrews proved in her 6-3, 6-4 win over No. 4 seed Kyle McPhillips that she is a title contender under any conditions.

Seeded eighth, Andrews, from Pomona, Calif., came into the match between the two reigning Easter Bowl champions (Andrews in 14s, McPhillips in 16s) with confidence, having beaten McPhillips in the Claremont, Calif. ITF this spring. But that was on hard courts, on Andrews' home turf; this match was on green clay, against the 2009 girls 16s Clay Court champion.

"We don't have a lot of clay courts in California," said Andrews, whose father grew up in Memphis and whose grandmother and aunt still live here. "And before this tournament I didn't hit on clay at all. But once I got to Memphis, I hit on clay a couple of times and I got used to it."

McPhillips started well, breaking Andrews to open the match, but she was broken right back and lost four straight games. Usually a very precise shotmaker, McPhillips was making errors of every kind--Andrews said she "caught her on a bad day today."

Andrews was able to keep McPhillips off balance, mixing in a forehand slice with her usual array of powerful backhands. In the second set, serving at 3-2, Andrews survived one break point in a five-deuce game and another serving at 4-3, with her serve helping her on key points. McPhillips couldn't dent Andrews' composure in the final game, and she calming served out the match to reach her first semifinal in an 18s National.

"I didn't know if I'd make it this far actually," Andrews said. "I knew I was going to play a lot of big girls who are used to playing on clay."

Andrews will meet top seed Whitney Kay in Saturday's semifinal. Kay spotted unseeded Californian Ashley Dai the first set but went on to take control late in the second to earn a 6-7(3), 7-5, 6-1 victory.

Kay had difficulty closing out sets yesterday against Meghan Blevins, and against Dai today she was also unable to serve out the first set with a 5-4 lead. In the tiebreaker, Kay, of Alpharetta, Ga., had a 3-1 lead, but lost the next six points, mostly on her unforced errors.

Down 2-0 in the second set, Kay rallied to win the next two games, and both players held serve until Dai was broken serving at 5-6. Kay's serve was effective throughout the match and her forehand was frequently putting Dai on the defensive, but it wasn't until Dai started making unforced errors that Kay was able to take control. Down 5-0, Dai managed one game on serve, but when it came time to serve out the match,
Kay had no difficulty, taking it at love.

Local favorite Catherine Harrison needed five match points to subdue No. 9 seed Ronit Yurovsky 6-1, 7-6(9), who had two chances to put the match into a third set.

Harrison came out very strongly, with her depth and pace giving Yurovsky problems, but Yurovsky, from New Kensington, Pa., adjusted in the second set, and took a 3-0 lead. Harrison won the next three games, and broke Yurovsky to take a 5-4 lead. She had two match points in that game, but didn't convert, and the set went to a tiebreaker. There were not a lot of scintillating points, with more errors than winners, but Yurovsky managed to save a match point at 6-5, and earn set points at 7-6, and 8-7. At 9-8 Harrison had another match point, but hit a forehand long; she earned her fifth and final by forcing an error after a long rally. Yurovsky missed her first serve, then her second, and an engrossing tiebreaker came to an anticlimatic end.

I've seen very little of No. 13 seed Caroline Price this week, as she has not played on Stadium Court, and today the daughter of former NBA player Mark Price was not on Court 5 very long. Price, from Duluth, Ga., defeated unseeded Oklahoman Whitney Ritchie 6-2, 6-1, her fourth straight two-set match. Price and Harrison will play Saturday's first semifinal on Stadium Court.

The doubles finals are set, with No. 7 seeds Katie Goepel and Blair Shankle meeting unseeded Breaunna Addison and Kelsey Laurente for the gold balls. Goepel and Shankle defeated the unseeded team of Elizabeth Begley and Alecia Kauss 6-2, 6-0 in one semifinal, while Addison and Laurente beat the unseeded team of Mara Schmidt and Tina Tehrani 6-4, 6-1 in the second.

Both Addison and Laurente are still in the consolation tournament, so the time for the doubles final will depend on their morning results.

And speaking of the consolation tournament, it's worth noting that after losing in the second round on Monday, Emina Bektas, the No. 2 seed, has played and won eight singles matches in four days of oppressive heat and humidity.

For complete results, see the TennisLink site.

13 comments:

Confused by tennis channel said...

Why is the Tennis channel showing tape delay of Anderson and Lacko Friday night instead of Fish-Dent live. An American event with two Americans get short shrift in prime time

fan said...

I'm not at all surprised that Andrews is doing well, actually I knew that she would be a dark horse :) Thank you for the coverage, as always.

getreal said...

Here we go again with the backdraw in B18s. Saw Nathan Pasha lost 2,3, very poor showing unless injured. Many other top juniors just w/drew. Seems a pattern that top juniors either not try, or withdraw. My suggestion would be to award a WC for B18s into the men's US Open qualies at the Zoo so these top player keep on battling in the backdraw.

Karl from FLA said...

Har Tru is not really clay. I played on hard courts for 20 years now on Har Tru the last 10. Har Tru is easy to adjust to and is nothing at all like true Euro red clay. Playing in the heat year round may be an advantage for the Florida kids but the surface not so much. Most kids adjust after a few hitting sessions on Har Tru.

adam said...

getreal

if an award is needed at this age then these players jusst have little fight in them. they dont deserve any more. the pattern is consistent.

adam

tennisforlife said...

Almost every WC into these big USTA national events (Clays/Kalamazoo) fails to complete the back draw. A simple solution would be to deprive those players of any future WC's into any events (Futures etc) if the back draw is not played to completion.

I don't understand why the USTA gives out these WC's and allows the same players to embarrass the tournament by pulling out of the backdraw and then hands WC's out again and again to the same players.

been-there said...

Every parent of any kid (that is not injured) should hang their head in shame for letting their child default out of the backdraw for no reason. It is poor parenting. It teaches the kid that if they don't get first place, they should just sulk, give up, and quit. What kind of life lesson is that?

Terrible parenting. If you are a parent that does that, you should feel ashamed and get your act together.

getreal said...

First of all the seeds who did not play or try in the B18 clays backdraw were not WCs (correct me if I am wrong). All I am saying it is tough to get psyched play the backdraw (none of the top jr tournaments or ITFs have one for a reason). That said, make it worthwhile for the top players to continue fighting to win the backdraw and a WC into the men's qualies would certainly inspire that. I think you are asking a lot for players to get psyched to play it in any meaningful way otherwise.

adam said...

yeah asking a lot for a player to try their hardest.....

adam

10is Mom said...

Withdrawing from the backdraw (or faking injury) allows a lower level player to opportunity to gain more points...which in the long run can skew ranking. However, as a mother of a "lower" level player who does play nationals, we "encourage" playing in the backdraw..for experience and sportsmanship.

At the local level, where endorsement is required by playing local tournaments to get into Nationals, I have seen many seeds go out and play 1 or 2 games and then withdraw injured...for the seeds, this will count for endorsement purposes...and as with a backdraw withdrawl, is just messing with the system...but hey, these are usually the USTA kids and I believe they are encouraged to do this.

Parent to Parent said...

10is Mom

CHEAP SHOT WITH ZERO VALIDITY!

"these are usually the USTA kids and I believe they are encouraged to do this."

You need to come up with specific examples if you are going to throw that statement out. Start with the Clay Courts that just ended and work backwards.

You talk the talk, but it's time for you to walk the walk.

Try implementing some of that "sportsmanship" on yourself.

been-there said...

People are too worried about points and ranking. You should be putting your kid into anything that will make him a better tennis player. Taking him out of the backdraw will not make the child a better player. It will make him a prima donna.

Put him in the tournament with the lousy courts and notorious wind. When he then goes to play the Easter Bowl (Palm Springs is always windy), he'll be ready.

adam said...

isn't it just like the pros? more ranking points means you are better.