A guest post by Jonathan Kelley--
This past weekend was an interesting one for those following
the younger generations of American professional tennis players. In his debut
Davis Cup tie, 20-year-old Frances Tiafoe came within a few games of sending
the United States to the final, falling in five sets to Borna Coric in Croatia.
In Cary, North Carolina, 21-year-old Reilly Opelka reached his second
consecutive Challenger final, but again came up short (so to speak) in the
final, this time to James Duckworth. And in Claremont, California, 20-year-old Brandon Holt won his first professional singles title at a Futures event.
Just prior to the weekend, I recorded a podcast with
Alex Gruskin for
Cracked Raquets in which I expressed my sense that 2018 had been somewhat
disappointing for American men, and specifically for the group born between
1996 and 1998. That group, which includes Tiafoe, Opelka,
Taylor Fritz, and
Jared Donaldson, has been heralded as the great hope for American men’s tennis
for years. They won four junior grand slams and several Grade A titles between
2013–2015. More recently, Donaldson qualified for the 2017 ATP Next Gen
tournament, while Tiafoe won his first ATP title in 2018 and he and Fritz are currently
in 5
th and 6
th place, respectively, in the 2018 Race to
Milan.
But there’s that nagging feeling I had that their collective
progress had stalled somewhat this year. So I thought I’d examine their
progress from a few different lenses: how they’ve progressed on their own
terms, in comparison with their peers internationally, and in comparison with
past cohorts of American men.
Here’s what I found.
Progression on their
own terms
The USA is fortunate to have nine players born between
1996–1998 who have been ranked inside the ATP Top 150, far more than any other
country. Tiafoe, Fritz, Donaldson, Opelka, Michael Mmoh, and Noah Rubin are
currently in the Top 150, while Ernesto Escobedo, Tommy Paul, and Stefan Kozlov
were there within the past twelve months. (Christopher Eubanks, born 1996, has
a career high of 183 and currently is ranked 221.)
However, with the exception of Tiafoe (and to a lesser
extent, Mmoh), their careers have been anything but bumpless. Nearly every
player has had to take some time off for injury, and even when healthy, there
has been a notable lack of breakthroughs, particularly in the last year.
To wit: No American man born 1996 or later has broken into the Top
100 since April 2017, and the last one who did, Escobedo, now resides
outside the Top 200. And while two players did debut in the Top 50 this year,
only Tiafoe remains there, as Donaldson has dropped to #98. Meanwhile Fritz,
while doing well to re-enter the Top 100 and stay in the Top 70, has yet to
approach the career high of #53 he set over two years ago; he’s currently at
#64.
Collectively, the nine players who have reached the Top 150
had 115 fewer ATP points at the end of the 2018 US Open than they did at the
end of the 2017 US Open. Take away Tiafoe’s 375 point jump, and the picture is
even starker.
ATP POINTS ACCUMULATED
THROUGH US OPEN, 1996–1998 AMERICAN MEN
Player
|
2017
|
2018
|
Tiafoe
|
715
|
1090
|
Donaldson
|
858
|
590
|
Fritz
|
554
|
825
|
Mmoh
|
409
|
450
|
Opelka
|
308
|
397
|
Rubin
|
256
|
443
|
Kozlov
|
405
|
219
|
Escobedo
|
636
|
250
|
Paul
|
364
|
126
|
TOTAL
|
4505
|
4390
|
The progress that has been made by Mmoh, Rubin, and Opelka –
all of whom are at or near career high rankings between 125 and 140 –
is counterbalanced by significant drop-offs by Escobedo, Paul, and Kozlov. Last
year, all nine players were ranked #205 or higher; this year, only six are.
Moreover, during the summer hardcourt season (which traditionally
has been strong for American men), none of the group advanced to a semifinal at
the ATP World Tour or Challenger Tour. While some players had solid wins (Rubin
over Isner in Washington, DC; Fritz over Mischa Zverev at the US Open) there
was no standout run like in 2017 (Paul in Atlanta and DC, Donaldson in
Cincinnati, even Mmoh winning the Lexington Challenger).
Comparison with international peers
Every player develops on his own path, and 22 is still young
for an ATP in which no player born in the 1990s has won a grand slam title.
That said, as I tweeted last month,
Alexander Zverev (GER), Stefanos Tsitsipas (GRE), and Borna Coric (CRO) are currently
in the ATP Top 20. Chung Hyeon (KOR), Karen Khachanov (RUS), Daniil Medvedev (RUS), Denis Shapovalov (CAN),
and Alex de Minaur (AUS) are all ranked higher than all young American men. And Andrey Rublev (RUS), Jaume Munar (ESP), and Hubert
Hurkacz (POL) are all Top 100, while #105 Corentin Moutet (FRA) and #108 Ugo Humbert (FRA) are just outside.
Of the 9 non-American players born after 1995 who had the
highest rankings post-2017 US Open, only two (Rublev and Bublik) had fewer ATP points post-2018 US Open. Overall, the trajectories of the top young
non-Americans are clearly smoother and in more of an upward direction than those
of the Americans.
ATP POINTS ACCUMULATED
THROUGH US OPEN, 1996–1998 NON-AMERICAN MEN
Player
|
2017
|
2018
|
Zverev
|
4470
|
4890
|
Khachanov
|
1330
|
1605
|
Rublev
|
1233
|
795
|
Chung
|
1017
|
1630
|
Shapovalov
|
926
|
1270
|
Coric
|
876
|
1825
|
Medvedev
|
819
|
1262
|
Bublik
|
583
|
294
|
Tsitsipas
|
483
|
1962
|
TOTAL
|
11737
|
15533
|
And while Tsitsipas was the ninth-ranked young non-American at #120 a year ago (behind five young Americans), this year that honor went to #59 Matteo Berrettini, who is behind only Tiafoe. Simply put, Americans are being sped past at a remarkable rate.
It is true that no other country has had the depth of US men – only Russia with three has multiple players born after 1995 in the Top 100, and they have no other
young player in the ATP Top 300. But national depth doesn’t win championships
in an individual sport (just ask France), and the idea that players from one
country will push their colleagues to the highest heights doesn’t bear out in this most international of arenas.
Comparison with
past American generations
The cohort of American men born between 1996–1998 have had more success at their ages than any three-year cohort from
the USA since 2003, when players born between 1981–1983 already had between them a slam champion (Andy Roddick), a
Top 20 player (Mardy Fish), a Top 30 player (Robby Ginepri), and a Top
40 player (Taylor Dent). And that cohort had better cumulative accomplishments
than any group going back a decade earlier (namely 1970–1972’s Sampras, Agassi,
Chang, Courier, and others).
But even then, depth was an issue. Roddick’s cohort featured no other players under 23 years old in the Top 250 following the
2003 US Open. And, of course, only Roddick in that group reached a major final
or won a Masters 1000.
A three-year cohort that has done very well is 1985–1987, which includes John Isner, Sam Querrey, Donald Young [Correction: Young was born in 1989], Brian Baker, Ryan Sweeting, Wayne Odesnik, and Tim Smyczek. But of that group, only Querrey had entered the Top 100 by the 2007 US Open, having achieved a then-career high of #47 the week before.
Interestingly, a three-year cohort just older than the one I’m
focused on, 1992–1994 (which also has three players who have reached the ATP
Top 60 in Jack Sock, Ryan Harrison, and Denis Kudla, plus another in Bjorn Fratangelo
who hit the Top 100), hit a similar lull four years ago. The top nine players in
that age range after the 2013 US Open collectively had 230 fewer ATP points a year later. The
good news is that in 2015, they had over 1,000 more points than in 2013 – despite
the absence of three of them from the rankings, and not including the addition
of players who had been playing college tennis such as Evan King and Marcos Giron.
So going by this comparison, we might expect 2019 to be a very strong one for
the current youngsters.
ATP POINTS ACCUMULATED
THROUGH US OPEN, 1992–1994 AMERICAN MEN
Player
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
Sock
|
608
|
756
|
1285
|
Kudla
|
568
|
451
|
681
|
R. Harrison
|
516
|
282
|
425
|
Kosakowski
|
127
|
175
|
0
|
Fratangelo
|
123
|
124
|
464
|
C. Harrison
|
99
|
0
|
0
|
Krueger
|
72
|
96
|
195
|
Berman
|
63
|
6
|
0
|
Novikov
|
31
|
87
|
240
|
TOTAL
|
2207
|
1977
|
3290
|
Moving forward
So what is to make of this Great Stalling? Is it
temporary or an ominous sign for the future? Will we see this cohort of American men
joining their international peers in the Top 20? Will we get some additions
into the Top 100 soon?
Several theories have been advanced as to what has and may continue
to limit these young American men from reaching the very top of the game.
Criticism has variously been raised about technique, athleticism, coaching, national
tennis culture, motivation, and mental strength. We should also keep in mind
that uninterrupted periods of good health have been missing for several of
them, and that perfect health is guaranteed to none of us.
Rather than diagnose any one player, I’ll say that while
they shouldn’t get too distressed about not having achieved certain ranking goals
by now, the next two years will be a critical time for them to make their mark.
Young players around the world have stopped giving excuses for coming up short
against top-level competition, and have started seizing opportunities. They have
improved deficiencies in their games with an eye toward future glory; meanwhile
they do what it takes to win pressure-packed matches today. None has yet won a Grand
Slam, but I’d be very surprised if it doesn’t happen by 2020. And they are
beginning to flood the Top 100, securing their spots in the main draws of
majors and playing regularly at the ATP level. They aren't waiting for Americans to keep up.
Still, let us remember that only eight American players born
after 1985 have spent any time at all in the ATP Top 50 to date, and two of those are
Tiafoe and Donaldson. And I still fully expect at least two more of the current
“Next Gen” to reach that ranking by the end of 2020, which would also be impressive.
Whether any of them ever wins a
Masters 1000 (a la Jack Sock) or reached a major final (as John Isner almost did) just can’t be predicted. But if more than five American players born
between 1994 and 1996 do reach the ATP Top 50 at some point in their careers, it will be a tremendous
accomplishment, and the current Stalling will have proved to be put a Pause.
